According to the latest RDF schema document, the domain of the rdfs:member property (which is inherited to all rdf:_nnn properties) is class rdfs:Container. However, it has been mentioned many times that rdf:_nnn properties can be "attached" to any resource, not only members of the rdfs:Container class. Furthermore, many test-cases concerning the rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema issue demonstrate the above fact, that rdf:_nnn properties are attached to any resource. I believe that this is contradictory. Should a resource with an rdf:_nnn property be considered a member of rdfs:Container class, even if it has been described as a member of another class? Nick Bassiliades -- ************************************************************** * Dr. Nick Bassiliades * * * * Programming Languages And Software Engineering (PLASE) Lab * * Logic Programming and Intelligent Systems (LPIS) Group * * * * Dept. of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki * * 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece * * * * Tel: +30310998418 E-mail: nbassili@csd.auth.gr * * Fax: +30310998419 URL: http://www.csd.auth.gr/~nick * **************************************************************Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 13:24:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT