- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:07:57 +0100
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Dan, In http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-seq-representation you raised an issue which was captured in http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-seq-representation as [[[ RDF containers, such as sequences are represented using ordinal properties of the form rdf:_n. Sequences represented in this way cannot be sorted recursively in languages such as Prolog. This has led to the definition of the DAML+OIL list representation which can be easily processed recursively. ]]] As recorded in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002May/0159.html the RDFCore WG has decided to add a list structure similar to that of DAML+OIL. The full resolution and a test case can be found at the above link. Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. Brian McBride RDF Core co-chair
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 13:09:48 UTC