W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

RDF Issue rdfms-seq-representation

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:07:57 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020829180505.02abb308@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

Dan,
In

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-seq-representation

you raised an issue which was captured in

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-seq-representation

as

[[[
RDF containers, such as sequences are represented using ordinal properties 
of the form rdf:_n. Sequences represented in this way cannot be sorted 
recursively in languages such as Prolog. This has led to the definition of 
the DAML+OIL list representation which can be easily processed recursively.
]]]

As recorded in

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002May/0159.html

the RDFCore WG has decided to add a list structure similar to that of 
DAML+OIL.  The full resolution and a test case can be found at the above link.

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride
RDF Core co-chair
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 13:09:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT