W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: RDF Issue rdfs-constraining-containers

From: (wrong string) çois <francoisleygues@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20020822224624.76028.qmail@web11806.mail.yahoo.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org


--- Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> Francois,
> 
> In
> 
>    
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Apr/0067.html
> 
> you raised an issue which was captured in
> 
>   
>
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-constraining-containers
> 
> as
> 
> [[[
> Is it possible to constrain the members of a
> container to be of a given type?
> ]]]
> 
> As recorded in
> 
>   
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0406.html
> 
> the RDFCore WG resolved:
> 
> [[
>   o Expressing such a constraint is beyond the scope
> of RDFS. Such 
> functionality belongs with more powerful ontology
> languages such as 
> daml+oil and owl.
> 
>   o The WG notes that DAML+OIL can express this
> constraint as described here.
> 
>   o The WG closes this issue
> ]]
> 
> Please could you respond to this message, copying
> www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
> indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution
> of this issue.
> 
> Brian McBride
> RDFCore co-chair
> 

Ok,  this is perfectly acceptable. I accept. 
 
François Leygues



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 18:46:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT