RE: QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total?

On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 22:35, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> I see where you're coming from, Dan, but I suspect the horse has already 
> left the barn on this one.

Well, we agree what the problem/issue is, anyway,
if not now to solve/address it.

Thanks for the response. Please keep me posted on any
relevant decisions the WG makes.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/