W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

error?

From: Franco Salvetti <franco.salvetti@tiscalinet.it>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:21:23 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020703091950.04806040@127.0.0.1>
To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

[stopped by spam filter -rrs]

Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 06:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <002a01c2227b$d11f33c0$14130a3e@hobbit>
From: "Franco Salvetti" <franco.salvetti@tiscalinet.it>
To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Alessandro Provetti" <provetti@gongolo.usr.dsi.unimi.it>

Hi,

in

<rdf:Property rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy">
   <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"/>
   <rdf:type resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/>
   <rdfs:subPropertyOf 
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#seeAlso"/>
   <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">isDefinedBy</rdfs:label>
   <rdfs:comment>Indicates the namespace of a resource</rdfs:comment>
   <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource"/>
   <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource"/>
</rdf:Property>
it seems to me that there is 2 (two) definition of isDefinedBy in terms of 
rdf:type.

The first line for me is the same statement than the one in line 3. Am I right?





Franco Salvetti
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 09:23:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT