- From: Franco Salvetti <franco.salvetti@tiscalinet.it>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:21:23 -0400
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
[stopped by spam filter -rrs] Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 06:17:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <002a01c2227b$d11f33c0$14130a3e@hobbit> From: "Franco Salvetti" <franco.salvetti@tiscalinet.it> To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org> Cc: "Alessandro Provetti" <provetti@gongolo.usr.dsi.unimi.it> Hi, in <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy"> <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"/> <rdf:type resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/> <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#seeAlso"/> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">isDefinedBy</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment>Indicates the namespace of a resource</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource"/> </rdf:Property> it seems to me that there is 2 (two) definition of isDefinedBy in terms of rdf:type. The first line for me is the same statement than the one in line 3. Am I right? Franco Salvetti
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 09:23:01 UTC