RDF Issue rdfms-xmllang

Tim,

In

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0172.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xmllang

as

[[[
"This is a mess - it is in the syntax and not in the model. Should have 
used an RDF vocabulary for language. It should be removed from the syntax."
]]]

As recorded in

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002-02-26-1


the RDFCore WG has resolved:
[[
   a literal consists of three components:
    o A representation of the parseType, which is a single bit
    o A language indicator which is a string as defined in XML
    o A fully normalized UNICODE string.
]]

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair