W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: [URI vs. URIViews] draft-frags-borden-00.txt

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 19:21:22 -0600
Message-Id: <p0510144ab89f41526842@[]>
To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
>Morning chaps,
>A gentle reminder about the role of rdf-comments.  Its a list where folks
>can send messages formally to the WG.  Discussion to clarify the meaning
>of a communication is fine, e.g.
>   Here's and issue
>     - not sure what you meant - this or that
>     - other
>     - ok registered as issue foobar.
>But its not the place for an extended technical discussion.  Its nice for
>us who to implement process stuff, not to have to wade through reams
>of techy

Techy?? TECHY????

>discusion to find what we are looking for.
>rdf-interest or rdf-logic would be good places.

Sorry, indeed we should move this. Jonathan, Id suggest switching it 
to rdf-logic, that OK with you?

IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2002 20:21:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:17 UTC