- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 19:21:22 -0600
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
>Morning chaps, > >A gentle reminder about the role of rdf-comments. Its a list where folks >can send messages formally to the WG. Discussion to clarify the meaning >of a communication is fine, e.g. > > Here's and issue > - not sure what you meant - this or that > - other > - ok registered as issue foobar. > >But its not the place for an extended technical discussion. Its nice for >us who to implement process stuff, not to have to wade through reams >of techy Techy?? TECHY???? >discusion to find what we are looking for. > >rdf-interest or rdf-logic would be good places. Sorry, indeed we should move this. Jonathan, Id suggest switching it to rdf-logic, that OK with you? Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2002 20:21:26 UTC