W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Comments on the new RDF Test Cases draft

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 08:12:39 +0100 (BST)
To: Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w3.org>
cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, phayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, www-rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0206010811310.25548-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Fri, 31 May 2002, Massimo Marchiori wrote:

> > The preamble to the test case descriptions _does_ say that all test
> > case results should be interpreted by a person (ie, that we're not into
> > exhaustive conformance testing).
> Blub.... you mean the test:description?
> This awfully reminds me of the rdfs:comment recent thread...
> What's the normative value of an rdf:description inside a test case?
> If instead it's in the main text, I am not sure about the reference.

The file containing these (the manifest file) is referred to normatively
from the spec.

jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
stty intr ^m
Received on Saturday, 1 June 2002 14:32:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:18 UTC