W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Comments on the new RDF Test Cases draft

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 19:03:26 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: "Massimo Marchiori" <massimo@w3.org>, <cmjg@engarde.ioctl.org>, <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Massimo Marchiori" <massimo@w3.org>
At 18:11 22/05/2002 +0200, Massimo Marchiori wrote:

>Brian, that's certainly the case: I don't see any real stopover on this
>issue. I'm a bit puzzled by the reply, though: shouldn't the issue be
>by the wg before declared closed?

Issue?  I haven't seen an issue.  I have seen a statement that you have a 
preference for doing it differently, but that you don't consider it to be a 

>  Saying last call is close means little
>(actually, last close is just meant for people to send issues...! ;)
>Anyway, back to technical arguments: yes, I don't see any stopovers (as
>already said in my
>email, so this ought to have been clear... no?)

Yes.  I was just making sure it was clear to everyone in the thread.

Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 14:03:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:18 UTC