- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:12:25 +0900
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Two comments:
- I didn't find any place in the document where it says that
application/rdf+xml is a document that contains only RDF,
or uses an RDF top element. I didn't see any language that
says that any document that contains a bit of RDF somewhere
can use this type. The document should be clear what the
intent is, it could be either.
- Section 4 is very difficult to understand for somebody who
is not very familiar with RDF. I think that section should
say two things:
- If I have something like <html:a href="document.rdf#fragment">,
what's supposed to happen. That's what RFC 2396 (in a bit
different words, of course) asks for. I could imagine
various answers:
- Ignore the fragment ID
- Try to find an rdf:ID or rdf:about that match, and jump there.
(this seems to be what the last paragraph is saying)
- Don't even try to download the document.
- Allow more than one of the above,...
- As used in RDF, a fragment identifier doesn't mean that
you jump there,...
Regards, Martin.
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 03:12:35 UTC