RDF Issue rdf-charmod-literals

Jeremy,

In

     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0014.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-charmod-literals

as

[[[
Does the treatment of literals conform to charmod ?
]]]

As recorded in

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0056.html

the RDFCore WG has decided to close this issue by approving test cases 
white, black 1 and black 2 submitted

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0016.html

for consideration.  The grey test cases were not approved; instead the WG 
decided to add text to the syntax specification pointing out that literals 
beginning with a combining character may not be serializable in RDF/XML, 
depending on the outcome of CHARMOD, and may cause interoperability problems.

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair