W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Meaning of an RDF document: issue rdfms-assertion

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:22:22 +0100
To: timbl@w3.org
Cc: danbri@w3.org, me@aaronsw.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <OFA295D5B9.B0246D9D-ONC1256B09.005E779A@bayer-ag.com>

Nice,
and it also reminds about
s p o.  -->  p(s,o) intension is p and extension is <s,o>
i a C.  -->  C(i)   intension is C and extension is <i>

> Precicely.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aaron Swartz" <me@aaronsw.com>
> To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
> Cc: "www-rdf-comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>; "Tim Berners-Lee"
> <timbl@w3.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Meaning of an RDF document: issue rdfms-assertion
>
>
> > On Friday, November 16, 2001, at 03:58  PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> >
> > > Its the predicate that sets the meaning, unless the predicate
> > > says that something else sets the meaning...
> >
> > I don't see how this is contradictory. If I say the Director is
> > in charge, but he can delegate authority to a domain leader,
> > does that lessen his authority? I'd say no.
> >
> > --
> > [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
> >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 12:46:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:29 GMT