- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:22:22 +0100
- To: timbl@w3.org
- Cc: danbri@w3.org, me@aaronsw.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Nice, and it also reminds about s p o. --> p(s,o) intension is p and extension is <s,o> i a C. --> C(i) intension is C and extension is <i> > Precicely. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aaron Swartz" <me@aaronsw.com> > To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org> > Cc: "www-rdf-comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>; "Tim Berners-Lee" > <timbl@w3.org> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:44 AM > Subject: Re: Meaning of an RDF document: issue rdfms-assertion > > > > On Friday, November 16, 2001, at 03:58 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > > > > Its the predicate that sets the meaning, unless the predicate > > > says that something else sets the meaning... > > > > I don't see how this is contradictory. If I say the Director is > > in charge, but he can delegate authority to a domain leader, > > does that lessen his authority? I'd say no. > > > > -- > > [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ] > >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 12:46:12 UTC