W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

RDF Issue rdfms-logical-terminololgy

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:07:03 +0000
Message-ID: <3BEFF3A7.8090007@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: connolly@w3.org
CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org



an issue with the RDF specs was raised on your behalf which was recorded in



   The current RDF terminology is inconsistent with the long established
   terminology used by logicians. For example, what RDF'er's call a 'model'
   is called an 'abstract syntax' by logicians. Logicians use the term
   model but for something quite different.

On 9th November 2001, as recorded in


the RDFCore WG resolved

   The WG closes rdfms-logical-terminololgy on the grounds that the
   new terminology introduced by the model theory adequately
   addresses this issue.

Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether 
this resolution is acceptable.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 11:07:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:17 UTC