W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: RDF Issue rdfms-syntax-incomplete

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:19:58 +0000 (GMT)
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: www-rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0111061217530.12223-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Brian McBride wrote:

> Jan,
>
> In
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0211.html
>
> you raised an issue with the RDF M&S spec which was recorded in
>
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-syntax-incomplete
>
> as
>
>    A graph which contains an anonymous resource which is the object of
>    two statements cannot be represented in the RDF/XML syntax unless a
>    URI is assigned to the resource.
>
> On 26th October 2001, the RDFCore WG decided
>
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0582.html
>
> to postpone this issue for consideration by a future WG.
>
> Please respond, copying www-rdf-comments whether this is an acceptable
> decision.

It is; ultimately, I'd like to see this resolved. However, it's far from
a show-stopper for me, and I'm fully aware of the problems
inherent in trying to shoehorn a workaround for this into the current
RDF/XML syntax.

Cheers-

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
"I like oranges more than apples!?" - that's like comparing apples and oranges!
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2001 07:21:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:29 GMT