W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: An RDF representation of RDF Schema with changes to reflect RDFCore

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 17:23:15 +0100
Message-ID: <3BB200F3.50905@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi Sean,

Will pass your comment on.  Its my personal preference too.

Brian




Sean B. Palmer wrote:

>><rdfs:Class rdf:ID="Resource">
>>
> [...]
> 
>><rdf:Property
>>  rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type">
>>
> 
> Could you possibly use rdf:about for all of the declared terms? Then the
> RDF will work locally as well as on the W3C server.
> 
> [[[
> When possible, use rdf:about rather than rdf:ID
> Your data will be able to be stored locally then, and will port much
> easier.
> For example, if you use: <rdf:Description rdf:ID="myProp"> in the file is
> stored at "http://blargh.org/", then the ID resolves to
> "http://blargh.org/#myProp". However, if this is then moved onto a local
> filing system, the URI might change to "file:///c:/blargh.rdf#myProp".
> ]]] - http://infomesh.net/2001/08/swtips/
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Kindest Regards,
> Sean B. Palmer
> @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
> :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2001 12:27:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:28 GMT