Re: New syntax spec

Rick,

I will forward your question to the WG for comment.

Brian


Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> 
> The draft for the refactored syntax looks much clearer.
> 
> One point that seems a little uncertain to me is whether the
> new productions are supposed to be interpreted
> open or closed.
> 
> For example, take 4.12 propertyAttr: it seems
> that if a typed-node element has an rdf:type attribute, it cannot have
> any attributes from any other namespace.  If it does not have
> an rdf:type then the element can only have one attribute in
> a non-RDF namespace.
> 
> Is that correct?
> 
> Cheers
> Rick Jelliffe