Rick, I will forward your question to the WG for comment. Brian Rick Jelliffe wrote: > > The draft for the refactored syntax looks much clearer. > > One point that seems a little uncertain to me is whether the > new productions are supposed to be interpreted > open or closed. > > For example, take 4.12 propertyAttr: it seems > that if a typed-node element has an rdf:type attribute, it cannot have > any attributes from any other namespace. If it does not have > an rdf:type then the element can only have one attribute in > a non-RDF namespace. > > Is that correct? > > Cheers > Rick JelliffeReceived on Tuesday, 11 September 2001 07:59:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:15 UTC