W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: New syntax spec

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:55:59 +0100
Message-ID: <3B9DFBCF.DD2F48BB@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

I will forward your question to the WG for comment.


Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> The draft for the refactored syntax looks much clearer.
> One point that seems a little uncertain to me is whether the
> new productions are supposed to be interpreted
> open or closed.
> For example, take 4.12 propertyAttr: it seems
> that if a typed-node element has an rdf:type attribute, it cannot have
> any attributes from any other namespace.  If it does not have
> an rdf:type then the element can only have one attribute in
> a non-RDF namespace.
> Is that correct?
> Cheers
> Rick Jelliffe
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2001 07:59:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:28 GMT