W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 18:57:32 +0100
Message-ID: <3B8D2D0C.CC9F2B68@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Dan,

I have noted your implementation feedback, along with other similar comments
in:

  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#attention-developers

Decisions will be reviewed in the light of implementor feedback received.

Brian

  

Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> Brian McBride wrote:
> > If you have any comments on this resolution, please send them
> > www-rdf-comments@w3.org.
> 
> I'm sorry to say I'm not satisfied; I tried to implement
> this solution and found that the idea of <li> matching
> typednode is a significant implementation burden without
> satisfactory justification.
> 
> For details, see
> 
> containers test0004 baffles me Dan Connolly (Tue, Aug 21 2001)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0116.html
> 
> et. seq.
> 
> > In
> >
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2000JulSep/0018.html
> >
> > you raised an issue concerning an ambiguity in the RDF grammar which was
> > recorded in the RDF issues list.
> >
> > The RDFCore WG has resolved and closed this issue:
> >
> >   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity
> >
> > Resolution:
> >
> > On 29th June 2001, the WG decided that containers will match the typed node
> > production
> > in the grammar (M&S Section 6, production 6.13) and that the container specific
> > productions (productions 6.25 to 6.31) and any references to them be removed
> > from the
> > grammar. rdf:li elements will be translated to rdf:_nnn elements when they are
> > found
> > matching either a propertyElt (production 6.12) or a a typedNode (production
> > 6.13). The
> > decision includes a set of test cases.
> 
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2001 14:01:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:28 GMT