W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2001

rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:38:16 +0100
Message-ID: <3B8B9EC8.8F0A7109@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: GK@Dial.pipex.com
CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Graham,

In

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0037.html

you raised an issue concerning RDF containers which was recorded in the RDF
issues list.

The WG has resolved and closed this issue:

  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema

Resolution:

On 29th June 2001, the WG decided that containers will match the typed node
production
in the grammar (M&S Section 6, production 6.13) and that the container specific
productions (productions 6.25 to 6.31) and any references to them be removed
from the
grammar. rdf:li elements will be translated to rdf:_nnn elements when they are
found
matching either a propertyElt (production 6.12) or a a typedNode (production
6.13). The
decision includes a set of test cases.

Please send any comments on this resolution to www-rdf-comments@w3.org.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2001 09:41:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:28 GMT