rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity

Dan,

In

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2000JulSep/0018.html

you raised an issue concerning an ambiguity in the RDF grammar which was
recorded in the RDF issues list.

The RDFCore WG has resolved and closed this issue:

  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity

Resolution:

On 29th June 2001, the WG decided that containers will match the typed node
production
in the grammar (M&S Section 6, production 6.13) and that the container specific
productions (productions 6.25 to 6.31) and any references to them be removed
from the
grammar. rdf:li elements will be translated to rdf:_nnn elements when they are
found
matching either a propertyElt (production 6.12) or a a typedNode (production
6.13). The
decision includes a set of test cases.

If you have any comments on this resolution, please send them
www-rdf-comments@w3.org.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair