Re: Attention Users! (2 in a series)

On Thursday, July 5, 2001, at 03:43  PM, Nikita Ogievetsky wrote:

> Annotated DAML+OIL (March 2001) Ontology Markup
> http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-walkthru.html
>
> Contains the following example markup:
>
> <daml:Disjoint rdf:parseType="daml:collection">
>   <daml:Class rdf:about="#Car"/>
>   <daml:Class rdf:about="#Person"/>
>   <daml:Class rdf:about="#Plant"/>
> </daml:Disjoint>
>
> Do you mean that this can be equivalently written like this:
>
> <daml:Disjoint rdf:parseType="daml:collection">
>   <daml:Class rdf:ID="#Car"/>
>   <daml:Class rdf:ID="#Person"/>
>   <daml:Class rdf:ID="#Plant"/>
> </daml:Disjoint>

No, You'd need to remove the # signs. Also note that, in 
following the rules of rdf:ID, duplicate uses of the same ID are 
not allowed.

> Or do you think that the above mentioned markup should be instead:
>
> <daml:Disjoint rdf:parseType="daml:collection">
>   <daml:Class rdf:resource="#Car"/>
>   <daml:Class rdf:resource="#Person"/>
>   <daml:Class rdf:resource="#Plant"/>
> </daml:Disjoint>

No, this is completely different.

--
       "Aaron Swartz"      |              The Semantic Web
  <mailto:me@aaronsw.com>  |  <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> |        i'm working to make it happen