Thanks for the bug reports Aaron. I have filed them as FEB-21-2001-{1-7} at: http://www.w3.org/RDF/Implementations/SiRPAC/SiRPAC-defects.html A few comments below. Art --- > <rdf:RDF > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:a="http://www.example.org/" > > > <rdf:Description> > <a:creator rdf:resource="lala">text</a:creator> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> The above appears to be illegal RDF - a propertyElt may only have content if it has an ID and/or parseType attribute. However, SiRPAC doesn't throw an error so I filed this as FEB-21-2001-4. > SiRPAC should probably complain if an li is used out of context: > > <rdf:RDF > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:a="http://www.example.org/" > > > <rdf:Description> > <rdf:li>a</rdf:li> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> Yes a warning would be a good idea but it's certainly legal according to the spec. I believe the container doc by Brian and Dave address this issue but I get a Not Found error when I try to access their doc: http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/bwm/rdf/issues/containersyntax/proposal as documented in: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Received on Sunday, 25 February 2001 11:18:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:17:02 GMT