W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: RDFS implicitly included?

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:55:07 -0600
To: Bill de hOra <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6B9DBAB.2332D%aswartz@upclink.com>
Bill de hOra <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

> I don't recall if the RDFS says this intension extends to any RDF
> schema: if not it should say so one way or another.

I see now -- you're right, it doesn't extend this to other schemas. I think
it probably should, or at least for all schemas which the system
"understands".

-- 
Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>|               RSS Info
  <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |   <http://www.blogspace.com/rss/>
AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| news and information on the RSS format
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2001 21:55:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:27 GMT