W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman

From: David Allsopp <dallsopp@signal.dera.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:23:10 +0100
Message-ID: <3B0E166E.4E82D329@signal.dera.gov.uk>
CC: www-rdf-logic@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org


Jonathan Borden wrote:
> 
> I have written a brief strawman proposal defining an RDF Abstract Syntax.
> 
> http://www.openhealth.org/RDF/RDFAbstractSyntax.html

You write:
"The index gives the index of a statement within a context in document
order. The index allows preservation of statement order as if each RDF
<Description> defines a container, and folds the RDF concept of
container directly into the RDF Abstract Syntax."

Is it implicit that a single context only contains data from one
document? If not, how can 'document order' be preserved?  What if a
second document adds triples to a container?

Similarly, if the data at a given URI change, and are obtained again,
can/should they be merged into the existing context with the same base
URI (or is there a mechanism by which a new, different context URI would
be generated?).

Regards,

David Allsopp.

-- 
/d{def}def/u{dup}d[0 -185 u 0 300 u]concat/q 5e-3 d/m{mul}d/z{A u m B u
m}d/r{rlineto}d/X -2 q 1{d/Y -2 q 2{d/A 0 d/B 0 d 64 -1 1{/f exch d/B
A/A z sub X add d B 2 m m Y add d z add 4 gt{exit}if/f 64 d}for f 64 div
setgray X Y moveto 0 q neg u 0 0 q u 0 r r r r fill/Y}for/X}for showpage
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 04:24:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:28 GMT