W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2000

RE: domain and range of "domain"

From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:43:48 -0400
Message-Id: <200008101844.OAA25854@tux.w3.org>
To: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
At 04:27 AM 8/10/2000 -0400, James Tauber wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, James Tauber wrote:
>> 
>> > I didn't get any replies to an earlier query as to why the 
>> domain and range
>> > of "domain" aren't defined in the RDF schema for RDF schemas.
>> 
>> Hrm, shouldn't the domain of "domain" be "RDF properties" and 
>> the range
>> be "RDF classes"?
>
>Yep. But I wondered why the RDF schema for RDF schemas doesn't say so.

Interesting; I expect it is an editorial oversight.
Those constraints are given in the prose:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/#s3.1.4
just not in the RDF.  Unfortunate.  They're present in the RDF
for rdfs:range, so it's an odd oversight.
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2000 14:45:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:27 GMT