Re[1]: how to address RDF fragment

> That is, the expectation of the Working Group was to say 
that
> the full URI of a resource named in a Description element 
using
> the ID attribute is formed by concatenating the base URI 
of the
> XML document (however that may be determined, including 
the new
> XBase specification http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase), a "#" 
character,
> and the ID attribute value.  I now think that this is 
wrong.
> (...)
> In fact, the RDF Model and Syntax specification does not 
tell you
> how to construct a full URI for the resource named by an 
ID or bagID.

aouch ! this sounds kind of revolutionnary to me !
Although I agree with you that plain URI+'#'+ID is not a 
good solution,
every implementation of RDF I know is using it this way !

How could we use a schema, else ?
(unless the schema does not use rdf:ID at all, which is a 
solution...)

We need to clarify this point quickly, I think.
Does this mean we are fast heading to RDF 2.0, at last  ? 
;-P

  Pierre-Antoine
 

_______________________________________________________
Vendez tout... aux enchères - http://www.caraplazza.com