- From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@cpe.fr>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 08:48:01 +0100
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
"Ralph R. Swick" wrote: > "If some property P2 is a subPropertyOf another more general > property P1, and if a resource A has a P2 property with a value B, > this implies that the resource A also has a P1 property with value B." > > Therefore B must be a permissible value for -- i.e. in the range of -- > both P1 and P2. very interesting ! I didn't get that, but that seems quite logic to me. But what is less clear, is when a subproperty P2 may need a range totally different from its superproperty ? Do you have an example ? Pierre-Antoine
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 1999 02:51:54 UTC