Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > app1 adds (#A, #B, "2") > app2 adds (#A, #B, "2") > app1 dels (#A, #B, "2") > app2 queries for (#A, #B) values and should get "2". That depends on what the semantics of deleting statements might be. If deleting a statement merely means that *you* are no longer asserting it, then the above is correct, but has nothing to do with literals: all would be the same if "2" were replaced by #C. But if deletion means that the statement is not *true*, then app2 should fail. In general RDF has no mechanism for dealing with agents who think they know contradictory things. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)Received on Friday, 9 April 1999 15:19:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:06 GMT