W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Are duplicate property/value pairs permitted for a resource?

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 15:44:07 -0400
To: Samuel Yang <syang@peoplemoverinc.com>
Cc: "'Dan Brickley'" <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>, "'www-rdf-comments@w3.org'" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "'rdf-dev@mailbase.ac.uk'" <rdf-dev@mailbase.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <19990408154407.B13035@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 12:26:06PM -0700, Samuel Yang wrote:
> I should amend the end of the 1st paragraph of my message below to read:
> 	I can see that two seemingly identical literals used in two
> different contexts (e.g., used with two different predicates) should
> probably not be considered identical.  However, I don't see any reason not
> to consider two statements to be identical when they contain identical
> subject and predicate resources and "identical" literal objects.  For
> instance, under what scenarios should the triple (#A, #B, "2") not equal the
> triple (#A, #B, "2")?

app1 adds (#A, #B, "2")
app2 adds (#A, #B, "2")
app1 dels (#A, #B, "2")
app2 queries for (#A, #B) values and should get "2".

Also, while a votes system could be implemented with an rdf container
(thereby assigning unique ordinals to each vote), I don't beleive the
language dictates, that.

Take this with a grain of salt, didn't thing about it long.

Received on Thursday, 8 April 1999 15:44:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:12 UTC