Dan Brickley wrote: > > Having an rdf:type property pointing to rdf:Bag is just RDF's way of > telling us that the anonymous resource "is A" rdf:Bag. > Is it *always* the case that if an RDF model has a resource with a property rdf:type whose value is foo then rather than: <rdf:Description [attrs]> <rdf:type resoure="foo"> [other properties] </rdf:Description> the syntax is: <foo> [other properties] </foo> Example: Rather than: <rdf:Description > <rdf:type resoure="rdf:Bag"> [other properties] </rdf:Description> the syntax is: <rdf:Bag> [other properties] </rdf:Bag> /RogerReceived on Thursday, 8 April 1999 07:41:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:12 UTC