I would be happy with a new namespace as well... but then we have to stick to it. I agree with Section 7 of the document: having to choose between two evils, I would rather have a changing semantics than a changing URI. And I think this is why these days people don't encode creation dates in URIs anymore... Cheers, Peter Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:04 +0100, Peter Mika wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> > > Hi... from a different Dan... > > >> [...] So the >> question: if the Semantic Web is to start today, what namespace should >> people use to represent hCalendar and other calendar information in RDF? >> > > I suggest > http://www.w3.org/ns/cal > backed by a W3C XG (which just needs 3 W3C member orgs to start). > > I think the test suite is critical too. Note the test suite > (and surrounding toolset) currently uses the icaltzd namespace. > > See: URIs for W3C Namespaces > http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri > > and > > How to Form an XG > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/how-to.html > > > p.s. sorry to be brief... this RDF stuff isn't really my day job > any more... struggling to squeeze this in... > >Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 15:57:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 December 2008 15:57:33 GMT