W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > December 2008

Re: VCal namespace

From: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:51:26 +0900
Message-ID: <834575810812020451v62990ef0p791bffa1ebb4eb46@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: "Peter Mika" <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org, "Richard Cyganiak" <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>

Hi, eh, it's last week when we met last time ;-)

2008/12/2 Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>:
> Ah, I'm glad this was a misunderstanding :)
>
> After this migration, do you have any new insights into the tradeoffs
> between the two designs? If you're aware of problems, it seems that we still
> could address them since none of this has massive adoption yet.

Actually, I guess Peter's proposal is not a migration of two designs,
but to clarify the namespace URI for the current design, i.e.
...2002/12/cal# and ...2002/12/cal/icaltzd# use the same date-time
model.

I still keep some amount of documents with original namespace, but I
use separate scripts and stylesheets for them. Some simple rules will
help to migrate them into new model.


btw, I also write a chapter that introduces RDF vcard (2006 version),
whose namespace is another headache...
-- 
@prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name
"KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 12:52:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 December 2008 12:52:09 GMT