W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > March 2005

Re: is this good? what is the last RDF/S? any other connectors?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:19:21 -0600
To: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
Cc: RDF Calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1111241961.8271.405.camel@localhost>

On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:57 +0100, Leo Sauermann wrote:
> hello fellows.
> I published my outlook iCal extractor and what i get is roughly this:
> a few questions:
> * are the ano dates with dtstamp correct?

"ano"? ah... anonymous?

No, you seem to be mixing the new timezones-as-datatypes
design with the old timezones-as-interpretation-properties

> * the anos bug me on querying, are they really needed?

No, not in the timezones-as-datatypes design.

> * why is this list so quiet?

We seem to have lost some momentum. Folks are busy with other
stuff, evidently.

> * what is the best rdfs extractor of cal metadata from iCal files? (i 
> need for gnowsis)

I use 

it depends on modules in swap and in 2002/12/cal ala:

$ PYTHONPATH=..:../../../../2002/12/cal python toIcal.py

It doesn't produce anything from your file because
it starts by looking for Vcalendars.

I just realized I hadn't checked in the changes to toIcal.py
that go along with my 25 Feb message

So I just checked them in:

revision 2.26
date: 2005/03/19 14:10:46;  author: connolly;  state: Exp;  lines: +31
COUNT param
timezones as datatypes

> <rdf:RDF
>     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>     xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
>     xmlns:j.0="http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical#">
>   <j.0:Vevent 
> rdf:about="http://leo.gnowsis.com/outlook/appointment/00000000ECD4B99358B9814B9DAFE2255CD8AE9A64243000">

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Saturday, 19 March 2005 14:19:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:12 UTC