W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > March 2005

Re: status property for annotations

From: Doug Royer <Doug@Royer.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:49:38 -0700
Message-ID: <423096C2.3070403@Royer.com>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
CC: Marja Koivunen <marja@annotea.org>, Mark Smith <mcs@pearlcrescent.com>, public-annotea-dev@w3.org

Would he PARTSTAT property work?

	ACCEPTED, DECLINED, NEEDS-ACTION


Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> 
> Bcc'ed to rdf-calendar for info / fishing purposes. Please keep 
> follow-up  to the annotea-dev list.
> 
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:16:58 -0500, Marja Koivunen <marja@annotea.org>  
> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Mark Smith wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone know of an XML status property that could be used with 
>>> the  Annotation schema?  The idea is to implement simple work flow 
>>> for  annotations that happen to be "change requests" or "action items."
> 
> ... Bugzilla ...
> 
>>> The minimum set of concepts I need are ASSIGNED, RESOLVED, and VERIFIED.
>>>
>>> iCalendar (RFC 2245) defines a Status property (and there is some 
>>> work  on XML schema for iCal).  But the allowed values for "to do" 
>>> kinds of  items are:  NEEDS-ACTION, COMPLETED, IN-PROCESS, 
>>> CANCELLED.  This would  work fine, except there is no concept similar 
>>> to VERIFIED.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know where else to look for this kind of thing?
>>>
>> This functionality has been on my Annotea extensions list a long 
>> time.  If there is a perfect schema it could be used with Annotea.
>

-- 

Doug Royer                     | http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------

               We Do Standards - You Need Standards




Received on Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:50:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:45 GMT