W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > February 2005

Re: event data vs. protocol data: fromIcal.py --noprotocol

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:17:58 -0600
To: Tim Hare <TimHare@comcast.net>
Cc: RDF Calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1109089078.4991.995.camel@localhost>


On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 22:26 -0500, Tim Hare wrote:
> Wouldn't METHOD  necessarily be "message" metadata, also?

Yes. I think so, anyway. I haven't run into that case
in practice, yet, though.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 16:17:59 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Danny Ayers: "Google calendar coming?"
Previous message: Dan Connolly: "is America/Chicago a daml-time time standard, or just CDT/CST?"
In reply to: Tim Hare: "Re: event data vs. protocol data: fromIcal.py --noprotocol"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:45 GMT