W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > August 2005

Re: [Ietf-caldav] xCal - resubmitted.

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:08:31 +0200
Message-ID: <42F8728F.9070808@gmx.de>
To: Doug Royer <Doug@royer.com>
CC: xcal-dev@inet-consulting.com, Calsify <ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org>, CalDAV DevList <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org, "ietf-calendar@imc.org" <ietf-calendar@imc.org>

Doug Royer wrote:
> 
> 
> The xCal draft has been rewritten and submitted to the IETF.
> 
> I have an XSLT translation file that I will be releasing
> soon on SourceForge that can translate an xCal object
> back to an iCal object. I am waiting for SourceForge
> to approve the project name.
> 
> Discussion takes place on xCal@INET-Consulting.com
> 
> Copies of the draft at:
> 
>     http://INET-Consulting.com/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-01.txt
>     http://INET-Consulting.com/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-01.html
>     http://INET-Consulting.com/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-01.xml
> 
> 
> JOIN the xCal mailing list at:
> 
>     http://inet-consulting.com/mailman/listinfo/xcal
> 

Just two quick formal comments...:

1) Is it intentional that in the examples, the iCalendar container 
element is in no namespace?

2) I don't think the IETF will let you use something like 
"http://ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt" as namespace name; but if they do, you 
probably should use "http://ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX" (no extension) instead.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 09:08:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 9 August 2005 09:08:47 GMT