W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Ical Ontology Question

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 01:06:59 -0500
To: Nikolaos Papachristodoulou <man_with_no_name_@hotmail.com>
Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-Id: <1123222020.18971.514.camel@dirk>

> could you copy me tha part of the ontology tha describe the freq tag
or the 
> component tag?

There's a report in progress that discusses the component property
a bit...

iCalendar syntax has no name for the relationship between an outer component
and an inner component; it just uses the position in the syntax to express
the relationship. Syntactic position in RDF only tells the "part of speech,"
i.e. subject, predicate, or object of a relationship, so we needed a name
for this relationship.
 -- http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/report1173.html

The freq property comes from
4.3.10 Recurrence Rule


Neither freq nor component is in the schema/ontology yet... for no
really good reason. But the schema/ontology is machine generated, and I/we
haven't decided on a way to maintain these exceptional properties yet.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 5 August 2005 06:07:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:12 UTC