missing types [was: revert recent timezone changes?...]

On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 03:15, Leo Sauermann wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> If you are at changing or "bettering" the scheme, I would recommend
> you stop creating the scheme automatically from the RFC (as the rfc
> won't change pretty soon ;-) and start adding the missing facts.
> 
> i.e. the scheme misses the types
> #Value_DATE-TIME
> #Value_DATE

Missing in what way? I might have known at one time, but I don't
remember now.

> which is really really bad, as they are used all over the place.
> or did I miss something here?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E