W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > October 2004

Re: revert recent timezone changes? put them in a new schema?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:25:55 -0500
To: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-Id: <1098192354.30433.937.camel@dirk>
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 11:24, Masahide Kanzaki wrote:
> At 10:35 AM -0500 04.10.14, Dan Connolly wrote:
> >I wonder if I should roll back the timezone changes
> >and start a new schema with the new timezone design.
> >
> >I'm not inclined to maintain 2 schemas. I'm willing to
> >move new development to schema with a URI different
> >from http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical but I'm not
> >offering to do maintenance on that one as well as
> >new development.
> 
> Yes, yes. It's very welcome to roll back the changes in the schema of
> current URI, as well as to discuss and develop modified schema with a new
> namespace URI.

Hmm... it seems that I never actually rolled them forward
in the 1st place.

I proposed the changes 14 Apr 2004 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2004Apr/0022.html

but the schema is at
revision 1.14 date: 2004/04/07 18:45:16
http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical


> >The tests and conversion tools will migrate to the
> >new schema, I think; I don't think I can afford to
> >keep 2 sets of them around.
> 
> That's fine. Keep existing data as is, and move forward.
> 
> cheers,
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 13:24:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:12 UTC