At 10:35 AM -0500 04.10.14, Dan Connolly wrote: >I wonder if I should roll back the timezone changes >and start a new schema with the new timezone design. > >I'm not inclined to maintain 2 schemas. I'm willing to >move new development to schema with a URI different >from http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical but I'm not >offering to do maintenance on that one as well as >new development. Yes, yes. It's very welcome to roll back the changes in the schema of current URI, as well as to discuss and develop modified schema with a new namespace URI. >The tests and conversion tools will migrate to the >new schema, I think; I don't think I can afford to >keep 2 sets of them around. That's fine. Keep existing data as is, and move forward. cheers,Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:24:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:44 GMT