In your proposal, case 2 is: At 5:04 PM -0500 04.4.14, Dan Connolly wrote: > <dtstart > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/tzd/America/New_York#tz" > >2003-01-08T13:00:00</dtstart> which implies dtstart to be a DatatypePrperty, while case 3 is: > <dtstart > rdf:parseType="Resource" > ><dateTime>1970-10-25T02:00:00</dateTime> > </dtstart> where dtstart is an ObjectProperty. Is this what you intended? This is fine for me, because current form won't become invalid. No new property name required... -- KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka http://kanzaki.com/info/webwho.rdf mailto:webmaster(at)kanzaki.com #Please use above address for a personal mail #instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only.Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 20:12:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:44 GMT