- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:47:24 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
At 13:05 15/04/04 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > >I actually found a problem with it when working out my > >AMS itinerary: cwm doesn't substitute into the datatype > >part of a literal. > >you mean you can't write an n3 rule that looks like :foo^^?x > >This is a problem with using cwm (admittedly, since that seems to be your >tool of preference, and given our focus on real world tools, that makes it a >potentially serious problem). Maybe I have mis-characterised it. But if you >use a longhand version with rdf:datatype as a property does the problem go >away? FWIW, I don't think either of my query processors would (currently) handle this. (It seems like a reason that interpretation properties for datatypes might have been a better way to go, but that's now water under the bridge.) #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 16:49:45 UTC