- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:07:30 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
There are several proposals and suggestions below, on winding up the IRC chats, documentation, IDs for events, timezones and interpretation properties, and xproperties. Please feel free to comment on those or anything below (preferably in a new thread), even if you can't make it to the meeting tomorrow. The next meet is this Wednesday, 2003-09-03, 1600UTC (tomorrow) http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=03&month=9&year=2003&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=0 We meet on IRC, irc.freenode.net #rdfig for 90 minutes. More on IRC: http://esw.w3.org/topic/InternetRelayChat Last meeting's weblog, serving as the meeting record: http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/08/20/2003-08-20.html Logs of the last meeting: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-08-20.html#T16-03-19 some agenda items * roundtripping http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/06/25/2003-06-25.html#1056557026.871899 ACTION mortenf: take a stab at regression tests for .ics->.rdf and/or .rdf->.ics * winding down the calendar chats? Recently there has been a reduction in enthusiasm about the RDF calendar chats. PROPOSED: that we move the discussions to email for now; the IRC chats can be resurrected if there is sufficient interest in the future. * documentation I would like to see a W3C Note or something similar come out of this work - what does everyone think? * xproperties and their usefulness or otherwise: Issue: roundtripping is not possible with xproperties http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-08-20.html#T15-43-10 possible solution: remove from tests. are there any we think are useful to support? [[ 16:27:12 <mortenf> seems there are 6 diff: 16:27:32 <mortenf> X-EVOLUTION-ALARM-UID X-LIC-LOCATION X-WR-CALNAME;VALUE=TEXT X-WR-ITIPSTATUSML;VALUE=TEXT X-WR-RELCALID;VALUE=TEXT X-WR-TIMEZONE;VALUE=TEXT 16:27:40 <mortenf> in all .ics files ]] * Other outstanding actions and items - http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/05/14/2003-05-14.html#1052921345.552964 InterpretationProperties, esp as applied to timezones -- we discussed this last week, but didn't resolve anything. I'd like to have a vote on what's best to do in this case. PROPOSED: that we note the issue but keep the status quo. The discussion starts about here: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-08-20.html#T17-00-59 [[ <DanC> here's where I am: (a) I'm uncomfortable with the way our RDF timezone properties work, and I suspect applying the InterpretationProperties pattern would help, but (b) I'm able to get work done with the status quo, and (c) I haven't found sufficient motivation to design and implement something better ]] [[ 17:24:09 <libby> given limited effort available to do this work, I wonder if the status quo might be the best thing to do 17:26:29 <libby> it seems to me that if we can work with it, it might be better declaring the vocab 'finished' and moving on to more interesting things, rather than starting another big job ]] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Aug/0001.html IDs for events? last discussion: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-08-20.html#T17-35-46 I'd be happier if we could get a resolution for this. PROPOSED: that we leave as is, that is, support UIDs as iCalendar RFC 2445 does, but not specify anything about whether or how one event is deemed to be the same event as another. - http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/05/14/2003-05-14.html#1052921472.659227 ACTION libby look at skical optimeset and report back - http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/06/25/2003-06-25.html#1056556072.203619 ACTION libby: add a couple schemas under cal/prod More agenda items very welcome. cheers, Libby
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:01:07 UTC