W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > March 2003

Re: reminder: next IRC meeting Wednesday March 12th 2003, 17:00 UTC

From: Ryan Lee <ryanlee@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:52:29 -0500 (EST)
To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
cc: <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0303111645370.12709-100000@tux.w3.org>

Agenda request:

Going from RDF to iCal.

Dan Connolly and/or I will be working on
  http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/toIcal.py
which is cwm-based, or maybe an XSLT version.  Particularly looking at
timezone issues and generating a correct iCal file.

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Libby Miller wrote:
> hi all,
>
> The next meeting is March 12th 2003, 17:00 UTC for 90 minutes
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=12&month=3&year=2003&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=0]
>
> on irc.freenode.net #rdfig
>
> all welcome.
>
> More agenda items to me as soon as possible please. If we can't fit them
> in this time, we can add them to the next agenda. Agenda items could
> include descriptions of problems or tools, as well as issues about the
> RDF conversion of the iCalendar syntax.
>
>
> Agenda so far
>
> 1.  is it OK to check GPL'd code in under
> http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ ?
> Libby Miller
>
> [[
> just to keep expectations modest... we can put
> that on the agenda, but we can't really make decisions about it.
> ]]
> Dan Connolly,
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Feb/0012.html
>
> This was postponed last time; we may have to postpone again.
>
> [[
> 18:37:06  <libby> G:POSTPONED
> ]]
> on the grounds that DanC isn't sure he can contribute to GPLed software,
> and it would be good to have all the code under a single license. At the
> moment, the java code is GPLed because it depends on Daniel Resare's
> GPLed parser.
>
> [[
> 18:26:48  <libby> I gues I could alk daniel if he feels like releaseing
> his code as non GPL, no idea if he would say yes
> ]]
>
> - daniel said no.
>
>
> 2. How will we know when we're done?
> Libby Miller
>
> Last week I asked Dan Connolly how long he thought this process (of
> converting iCalendar to RDF) would take. He said he didn't know what the
> criteria would be for finishing. I think this an interesting question
> and I'd like to have a chat about it.
>
>
> 3. Test data - where's the best place to get it from?
> Libby Miller
>
> There is a great deal of iCalendar data out there, but most of it is
> generated by apple's iCal program, which has some errors in the way it
> exports to iCalendar.
>
> http://icalshare.com/
>
> http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/mail-archive/msg04657.html thread, and
> esp
> http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/mail-archive/msg05069.html
> (although apple say that they will fix this:
> http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/mail-archive/msg05114.html)
>
> We also need complex and varied data to get good conversion tools.
>
>
> Libby
>
>

-- 
Ryan Lee
ryanlee@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 16:52:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:43 GMT