W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > January 2003

Re: cwm/n3 and naming blank nodes? (calendar rules)

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:12:58 -0500
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-ID: <87bs2yiaol.fsf@nwalsh.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> was heard to say:
| Norm Walsh asked, back on 1Dec...
| http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Dec/0002.html
|
| about rules for repeating events, some with
| end markers and some without.
|
| I completely missed that message, as I only catch
| up with www-rdf-interest occasionally, but meanwhile, in
| www-rdf-calendar, I wrote some rules that, I think,
| answer Norm's question.

Ah, yes. You're solution works by adding a new property (:birthEvent) to the
graph. I hadn't thought of doing that. Is there a solution that doesn't add
a new property?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Through space the universe grasps me and
XML Standards Architect | swallows me up like a speck; through thought
Web Tech. and Standards | I grasp it.--Pascal
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+FZpqOyltUcwYWjsRAr28AKCbsQKIdGtFH9zOJm4vAwgPQtCj6ACeJTWr
s56qiIY6plOcJ4c7+DAoHZ4=
=4raC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 3 January 2003 09:15:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:43 GMT