- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:49:11 +0100 (BST)
- To: Paul Buhler <pbuhler@cs.cofc.edu>
- cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Paul, although we discussed the hybrid document a little, I don't think there were sufficient implementations to have reached an agreement. So I'd be really glad to hear about any changes you would like to make. Libby On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Paul Buhler wrote: > > I have just finished reading through the discussion that occurred on the > mail list in July 2001. It seems at that time, consensus was reached > that the current version of hybrid.rdf was good enough. That RFC2445 has > many 'extra' capabilities that were not required. So in someway, I > believe that this is a response to my email of yesterday. > > In the FWIW category, the Retsina Semantic Web Calendar Parser project > (RCal) lists the elements of the hybrid.rdf schema that it utilizes > (also those from the Dublin Core and FOAF) at > www.daml.ri.cmu.edu/Cal/RDFCal-Release-1_0a.html > > I will likely continue to work on the complete hybrid.rdf because it > poses some interesting modeling challenges. I will let the calendar task > group know when I have something worth showing. > > Regards, > > Paul Buhler > > >
Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 04:51:11 UTC