W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > October 2001

Re: XML iCal draft changes

From: Gary Frederick <gary.frederick@jsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:09:47 -0500
Message-ID: <3BCAFC3B.3040900@jsoft.com>
To: ietf-calendar <ietf-calendar@imc.org>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
I like what I had seen of the RDF/XML calendar work. The thought that 
kept coming up for me was that there were at least two 'parts' that 
could come out of all the work. One a description (dtd) of iCalendar 
based on RFC 2445 and another that was the rest of the calendaring 
standards in RDF. Then you would have eg <vevent> as part of the 
iCalendar dtd and RDF that described relationships etc from RFC 2446 etc.


Libby Miller wrote:
> Hi Eric
> We've been working on drafts of an RDF/XML calendar schema based on
> iCalendar[1], [2]. It looks like we should liaise with you guys, since
> our goals are similar, perhaps to produce a stylesheet which converts
> between the two, for example.
> Your message prompts me to ask a question: is there a model described
> anywhere for the work in icalendar or in xcal? Michael Arick did a
> brilliant job turning icalendar into UML[3], but I'd be interested to
> supplement this with what the thoughts were of the icalendar group
> _while_ the icalendar RFC was being created, if these are described
> anywhere. It doesn't have to be UML, just a summary diagram or
> description of the objects and properties.
> all the best
> Libby
> [1] http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/04/calendar/ (RDF calendar homepage)
> [2] http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/06/schemas/ical-full/hybrid.rdf
> (current schema draft, unstable)
> [3] http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/~marick/iCalendarUML.html
> --
> Dr Libby Miller
Received on Monday, 15 October 2001 11:11:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:10 UTC