W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > August 2001

Re: relationship to iCalendar

From: Martijn van Beers <martijn@eekeek.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:11:50 +0200
To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20010813211150.B9139@khazad-dum.copa.nl>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 04:24:30PM +0100, Libby Miller wrote:
> > Hrm. what's wrong with sticking close to iCalendar?
> We fully intend that documents written in rdf-cal format (or whatever we
> decide to call it) will be mappable to iCalendar format and
> vice-versa. 
ok, good :)

[...]
> Also the capitalisation of names in iCalendar will probably
> change in rdf-cal because the convention in RDF is to give classes a
> first capital letter and have properties in lower case. These again are
> all fairly trivial.
Note that the last paragraph of section 4.1 reads:

   All names of properties, property parameters, enumerated property
   values and property parameter values are case-insensitive. However,
   all other property values are case-sensitive, unless otherwise
   stated.

[...]
> More fundamental is the difficulty that iCalendar may not give us all
> that we may want from descriptions of events.
Hopefully you will be working with the CALSCH WG to solve this on both
sides.


Martijn
Received on Monday, 13 August 2001 15:09:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:10 UTC