W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > August 2001

Re: relationship to iCalendar

From: Martijn van Beers <martijn@eekeek.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 20:27:22 +0200
To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20010810202722.A4936@khazad-dum.copa.nl>
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:10:09AM +0100, Libby Miller wrote:
> http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/06/schemas/ical-full/hybrid.rdf
> > 3. How closely does this specification model the iCalendar structure?
> currently, very closely, although as we get more implementation
> experience, this may change.

Hrm. what's wrong with sticking close to iCalendar? I'm working on
Net::ICal, a perl implementation of rfc2445, and I was thinking
of making it capable of outputting rdf as specified by your schema,
so we can use xsl to convert it to html/other xml formats. But
if you're going to move away from iCalendar, I'd have to come up
with my own xml format.

Another question, why are <ical:VEVENT>s wrapped in a <ical::VEVENT-PROP>?
From the example data you have
(http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/06/content/swws2001-07-30.rdf) it looks
like it's just a gratuitous extra tag.

Received on Friday, 10 August 2001 14:25:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:10 UTC