Re: CGI/Perl vs. Middleware

• To: Ingo Macherius <ingo.macherius@mwe.hvr.scn.de>
• Subject: Re: CGI/Perl vs. Middleware
• From: David Gee <david13@sol1.uel.ac.uk>
• Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 18:14:35 +0100 (BST)
• Cc: www-rdb@w3.org
• From www-rdb-request@www10.w3.org Thu Sep 19 13: 15:24 1996
• In-Reply-To: <199609191118.NAA06713@ESAMX6.mwe.hvr.scn.de>
• Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960919180220.26268C@sol1.uel.ac.uk>
• X-List-URL: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Archives/Public/www-rdb/

I will also bite.......


  I tried to use Microsofts IDC ODBC interface for NT but I found that it 
was to limiting so I moved to perl and the ODBC modules. The access seems 
to be fast enough and Ill probably only move to middleware or C++ 
(hahahahah) when performance becomes an issue. (alternatively ill try to 
figure out how the the ISAPI perl module works.)  


One of the great things about  Perl is its portability: The NT-ODBC perl 
program was originally a OraPerl (Oracle database on various SUNs) which 
changed to DBI then to a postgres Perl program (on a solborne which 
wouldn't run Oracle).  Each time only the data access module was changed 
...... 



David

http://161.76.121.2/ 

• Re: CGI/Perl vs. Middleware
• From: Ingo Macherius <ingo.macherius@mwe.hvr.scn.de>

• Prev: cc:Mail UUCPLINK 2.0 Undeliverable Message
• Next: cc:Mail UUCPLINK 2.0 Undeliverable Message
• Index: Message index of www-rdb@w3.org mailing list
• Thread: Thread index of www-rdb@w3.org mailing list