[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

cc:Mail UUCPLINK 2.0 Undeliverable Message

User mutual!OCARROLL at TMC_HH@mutual.co.uk is not defined
           Original text follows 
-----------------------------------------
Received: by ccmail
Received:  from uupsi by co.uk (UUPC/extended 1.11) with UUCP;
           Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:57:09 BST
Received: from www19.w3.org by sys4.cambridge.uk.psi.net (8.7.5/SMI-5.5-UKPSINet)
	id AAA10120; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:53:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: by www19.w3.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA25722; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 19:50:58 -0400
Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 19:50:58 -0400
Resent-Message-Id: <199609172350.TAA25722@www19.w3.org>
From: otisg@panther.middlebury.edu (Otis Gospodnetic)
X-ccAdmin: mutual@uupsi
Message-Id: <9609172347.AA84756@panther.middlebury.edu>
Subject: Re: Vendors....
To: www-rdb@w3.org
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 19:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.ULT.3.95.960917145316.20264S-100000@red7.cac.washington.edu> from "Bruce Alexander" at Sep 17, 96 02:59:53 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-List-URL: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Archives/Public/www-rdb/
Resent-From: www-rdb@w3.org
X-ccAdmin: mutual@uupsi
X-Mailing-List: <www-rdb@w3.org> archive/latest/282
X-Loop: www-rdb@w3.org
Sender: www-rdb-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: www-rdb-request@w3.org
Precedence: list

add Sybase's web.sql (I think) to that list.

Otis

> 
> Microsoft has some good products to tie FoxPro, Access, or SQL Server to
> the web.  I've never used them, but I hear they're okay.
> 
> Claris has something to tie FileMaker Pro to the web.  I haven't used it
> but I'm converting an existing FMP database to standard cgi, going from
> Mac to UNIX, and what I see is that they store alot of stuff directly in
> the db (embedded html, for instance).  There seems to be some problems
> with update access, but read-only works pretty well.  Looks kind of
> storage-hoggish if you ask me, but what do I know?  The point is I hear
> tell that the development cycle for the web pages is nice and short and
> the gateway is reliable.  I have no reason to doubt.
> 
> Informix is real web friendly.  Version 7 has both ESQL/C and CLI/ODBC
> access, but the html are your problem.  I'm using the ODBC option with C
> language CGI right now and I'm real happy with it.  Some folks upstairs
> are using an ESQL/C interface and they seem to be pleased too.  I hear
> tell there's a new product out for Informix that is more like what you
> want (actual development tools for the web); but that's only hearsay. 
> 
> 
> Bruce Alexander <balexand@cac.washington.edu> 
> UW Computing & Communications    
> Student Information Systems
> (206) 685-6293
> 
>             - All views and opinions expressed are my own -
> 
> 
> On Tue, 17 Sep 1996, John D Groenveld wrote:
> 
> > What would you like to talk about? I have a question. Besides Oracle, which 
> > RDBMS vendors ship with Web gateway products (4GL's, Web enabled dev tools)? 
> > I'm not interested in 3rd party tools.
> > Thanks,
> > John
> > groenvel@cse.psu.edu
> > 
> > 
>